behaviours whether good or bad vary in their definition by many. For instance, the banality of evil, some commit deeds that are considered 'evil' by standardised norms but completely believe their behaviour to be good. So how can you say for sure that something is 'good' or 'evil'. That would only leave good and bad intentions/behaviours.
I don't need a sophisticated response, just any discussion on the basis of what I wrote :)
Well, of course the true "evil" and "good" don't exist. War is a thing, and whoever wins always say that their opponent started first and make up bullshit about all the bad things they've done... (even though 50% of it is false).
A hacker can just decide to attack the largest data server of some really large company just to expose their crimes or just to take revenge on them for something bad they did in the past.
Edward Snowden even went head on with the FBI or CIA... and people are still debating whether he's a bad person for doing it...
Nothing is right, and nothing is wrong... the only thing you should base your actions on is whether you want the same thing done to you or not, if you were in their position.